A fast adjoint-free shape gradient for p-Laplacian compliance: algorithmic speedup and engineering benchmarks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14244/lajm.v5i1.111Palabras clave:
shape optimization, p-Laplacian, compliance minimization, adjoint-free method, nonlinear elasticity, benchmark problemsResumen
Shape optimization of nonlinear membranes and non-Newtonian flow domains governed by the $p$-Laplace operator is hampered by the cost of an auxiliary linearised adjoint solve at every iteration. We show that this solve is unnecessary: a self-adjoint identity reduces the adjoint state to a multiple of the primal state, halving the PDE cost per iteration. We derive a closed-form boundary expression of the shape gradient, extend the analysis to the singular regime $1<p<2$ via Muckenhoupt-weighted Sobolev spaces, and prove subsequential convergence of the resulting descent algorithm. Three engineering benchmarks (cantilever, MBB beam, short bridge) for $p\in\{1.5,2,3,4\}$ deliver compliance reductions of up to 51.8%, demonstrate a CPU speedup of up to 25% over the classical full-adjoint method, and confirm identical iterates to floating-point precision. The framework integrates readily into existing finite-element shape-optimization codes.Citas
[1] G. Allaire, Conception optimale de structures, Mathématiques & Applications, vol. 58, Springer, Berlin, 2007.
[2] G. Allaire, C. Dapogny, and F. Jouve, Shape and topology optimization, Geometric Partial Differential Equations, Part II (A. Bonito and R. H. Nochetto, eds.), Handbook of Numerical Analysis, vol. 22, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2021, pp. 1–132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.hna.2020.10.004
[3] G. Allaire, F. Jouve, and A.-M. Toader, A level-set method for shape optimization, C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 334 (2002), no.12, 1125–1130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1631-073X(02)02412-3
[4] M. P. Bendsøe and O. Sigmund, Topology optimization: Theory, methods, and applications, Springer, Berlin, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05086-6
[5] J. Céa, Conception optimale ou identification de formes: calcul rapide de la dérivée directionnelle de la fonction coût, RAIRO Modél. Math. Anal. Numér. 20 (1986), no. 3, 371–402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/1986200303711
[6] D. Cruz-Uribe, K. Moen, and S. Rodney, Matrix Ap weights, degenerate Sobolev spaces, and mappings of finite distortion, J. Geom. Anal. 26 (2016), no. 4, 2797–2830. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12220-015-9649-8
[7] C. Dapogny and F. Feppon, Shape optimization using a level set based mesh evolution method: an overview and tutorial, C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 361 (2023), 1267–1332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5802/crmath.498
[8] K. Deckelnick, P. J. Herbert, and M. Hinze, A novel W^{1,∞} approach to shape optimisation with Lipschitz domains, ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var. 28 (2022), Paper No. 108, 29 pp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/cocv/2021108
[9] K. Deckelnick, P. J. Herbert, and M. Hinze, Convergence of a steepest descent algorithm in shape optimisation using W^{1,∞} functions, ESAIM Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 59 (2025), no. 3, 1505–1529. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/2025033
[10] E. DiBenedetto, Degenerate parabolic equations, Universitext, Springer, New York, 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0895-2
[11] E. B. Fabes, C. E. Kenig, and R. P. Serapioni, The local regularity of solutions of degenerate elliptic equations, Comm. Partial Differential Equations 7 (1982), no. 1, 77–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03605308208820218
[12] F. Feppon, G. Allaire, and C. Dapogny, Null space gradient flows for constrained optimization with applications to shape optimization, ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var. 26 (2020), Paper No. 90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/cocv/2020015
[13] S. González-Andrade, A preconditioned descent algorithm for variational inequalities of the second kind involving the p-Laplacian operator, Comput. Optim. Appl. 66 (2017), no. 1, 123–162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10589-016-9861-x
[14] J. Hadamard, Mémoire sur le problème d’analyse relatif à l’équilibre des plaques élastiques encastrées, Mémoires présentés par divers savants à l’Académie des Sciences 33 (1908), 1–128.
[15] F. Hecht, New development in FreeFem++, J. Numer. Math. 20 (2012), no. 3-4, 251–265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jnum-2012-0013
[16] A. Henrot and M. Pierre, Variation et optimisation de formes: Une analyse géométrique, Mathématiques & Applications, vol. 48, Springer, Berlin, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-37689-5
[17] P. Lindqvist, Notes on the p-Laplace equation, 2nd ed., Report/University of Jyväskylä, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, vol. 161, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, 2017.
[18] M. Mihăilescu and V. Rădulescu, On a nonhomogeneous quasilinear eigenvalue problem in Sobolev spaces with variable exponent, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 135 (2007), no. 9, 2929–2937. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-07-08815-6
[19] P. M. Müller, N. Kühl, M. Siebenborn, K. Deckelnick, M. Hinze, and T. Rung, A novel p-harmonic descent approach applied to fluid dynamic shape optimization, Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 64 (2021), 3489–3503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-021-03030-x
[20] F. Murat and J. Simon, Études de problèmes d’optimal design, Optimization Techniques: Modeling and Optimization in the Service of Man, Part 2, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 41, Springer, Berlin, 1976, pp. 54–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-07623-9_279
[21] T. De Pauw and A. Henrot, A finite element method for shape optimization with applications to free boundary problems, Free Boundary Problems, International Series of Numerical Mathematics, Birkhäuser, Basel, 2005, pp. 141–150.
[22] O. Pironneau, Optimal shape design for elliptic systems, Springer Series in Computational Physics, Springer, New York, 1984. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-87722-3
[23] J. Sokołowski and J.-P. Zolésio, Introduction to shape optimization: Shape sensitivity analysis, Springer Series in Computational Mathematics, vol. 16, Springer, Berlin, 1992.
[24] H. Wyschka and M. Siebenborn, Towards computing high-order p-harmonic descent directions and their limits in shape optimization, Modeling, Simulation and Optimization of Fluid Dynamic Applications (A. Iske and T. Rung, eds.), Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, vol. 148, Springer, Cham, 2023, pp. 147–163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45158-4_9
[25] Y. Yousfi, I. Hadi, and A. Benbrik, Optimal form for compliance of membrane boundary shift in nonlinear case, Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 2018 (2018), Art. ID 1689269, 9 pp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1689269
[26] E. Zeidler, Nonlinear functional analysis and its applications. II/B: Nonlinear monotone operators, Springer, New York, 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0981-2
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Yasser Yousfi
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Los autores pueden celebrar acuerdos contractuales separados para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión publicada del trabajo de la revista (por ejemplo, publicarlo en un repositorio institucional o en un libro), con el reconocimiento de su publicación inicial en esta revista.
